|
|
So What Makes Wes Tick?
Politically I'm a bit tricky to describe; I'm
neither liberal nor conservative, Republican nor
Democrat. But I'm not really a "moderate" either-- I do take strong
stands on many issues. Sometimes those stands will be identified as
conventionally "liberal," at other times as conventionally
"conservative." Moreover, the stands are not only variable, but
pretty complex-- even within a given issue I'll assume strong convictions, some
of which are held by liberals and others by conservatives (as in the case of
Iraq, for example). Above all, I'm deeply analytical about whatever stand I
take, and I just don't believe that the shoehorned categories of
"conservative" or "liberal," as we often conceive them, reflect the reality around us. Thus although you'll
see a consistent strain of thought in what I write, it'll be tough to
pigeonhole it into traditional categories. I'm an inveterate believer in the
moral capacity of the human mind, in the adaptability of the human intellect,
and in the inherent moral value of sentient, conscious beings, human and
animal. You can see some of my contemplation at work, big-picture style, in my
Vision essay. In general, I think that the best society vigorously encourages
people to utilize their talents to the max and to act creatively-- while
preserving the memory of its culture as well as the earlier creative
achievements of human civilization and nature alike.
Stated briefly: A successful society enables the creative
juices of its people to flow and to nourish the soil of intellectual, artistic,
commercial, and scientific and technological achievement, while simultaneously
and consciously preserving "nature's creativity"-- i.e., the natural
richness of the flora and fauna in that society's ecosystem. Thus, in my very
humble opinion, the great challenge of society today is to reconcile the basic
needs and strivings of its human population with the indispensable requirement
to preserve and protect the wealth innate in its environment, and so in turn,
the economic calculations of such a society place a high premium on clean
living and ecological sustainability. This belief is a massive driver for me in
what I consider to be humanity's most important project in the third
millennium-- reopening the frontier into space. Moral and ethical dilemmas,
historically, have been confronted successfully only when technical advances
merge with arguments of justice to produce a viable solution-- the abolition of
slavery in the wake of the industrial revolution being a prime example. There
are several technical advances which, I believe, will be critical in avoiding
catastrophic wars and serious damage to world civilization in the 21st
century-- cheap desalination of water and improvement of renewable energy
sources being among the most critical. But above all, we've got to become spacefaring. Otherwise, we're gonna
be stuck in a zero-sum game in which everybody will lose.
bravenet.com